Thursday, December 31, 2020

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognizes Asia-Pacific’s Top Companies for Industry Excellence

Frost

SINGAPORE, Dec. 31, 2020 /PRNewswire/ — Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Awards honor organizations that have accomplished innovative or disruptive breakthroughs and continually demonstrated excellence.

Photo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1393616/Frost_Sullivan_Best_Practices_Awards.jpg

Mr. Shivaji Das, Partner and Asia-Pacific Managing Director at Frost & Sullivan, noted that the award recipients have consistently demonstrated outstanding achievement and superior performance in areas such as leadership, technological innovation, customer service, and strategic product development amidst the changing business landscape.

Frost & Sullivan follows its proprietary, measurement-based methodology combined with extensive research, in-depth interviews, analysis, and benchmarking to shortlist deserving companies in each category. With real-time performance indicators such as market share, revenue growth, customer acquisitions, product/service value, and technology innovation forming the backbone of the selection process, the winners represent the best of the best in the Asia-Pacific region.

Seven awards were presented and these were segmented into regional and national categories. Frost & Sullivan congratulates all recipients of the Asia-Pacific Best Practices Awards.

Award Titles and Categories

Recipients

Global and Regional titles

2020 Global Secure SD-Wan Vendor of the Year

Fortinet

2020 Asia-Pacific Privileged Access Management Vendor of the Year

CyberArk

2020 Asia-Pacific Customer Contact Optimization Solutions Vendor of the Year

Verint Systems

2020 Asia-Pacific Cloud Video Collaboration Provider of the Year

Zoom Video Communications, Inc.

2021 Asia-Pacific Customer Service Software Customer Value Leadership Award

Zendesk

Country Titles

2020 Australia Email Security Vendor of the Year

Proofpoint

2021 Japan Contact Center Customer Value Leadership Award

Rakuten Communications

About Frost & Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Partnership Company, works in collaboration with clients to leverage visionary innovation that addresses the global challenges and related growth opportunities that will make or break today’s market participants. For more than 50 years, we have been developing growth strategies for the global 1000, emerging businesses, the public sector, and the investment community. Is your organization prepared for the next profound wave of industry convergence, disruptive technologies, increasing competitive intensity, Mega Trends, breakthrough best practices, changing customer dynamics, and emerging economies? Contact us:  Start the discussion

Media Contact:

Kala Mani. S.
Associate Director, Best Practices – Asia-Pacific
Email: kala.manis@frost.com

The content is by PR NewsWire. DKODING Media is not responsible for the content provided or any links related to this content. DKODING Media is not responsible for the correctness, topicality or the quality of the content.

The post Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognizes Asia-Pacific’s Top Companies for Industry Excellence appeared first on DKODING.



from https://www.dkoding.in/press-release/frost-sullivan-best-practices-recognizes-asia-pacifics-top-companies-for-industry-excellence/
via Dkoding RSS Feed

Film ‘Poonam’ is screening to great applause after winning 2 more awards

Film

BANGALORE, Dec. 31, 2020 /PRNewswire/ — Poonam, a 15 mins.’ social short produced by Shilpi’s Voice & Visuals – Bangalore and Epicreel – Hyderabad has bagged the Special Jury Award for the Best Indian Short Film at the recently concluded Uruvatti International Film Festival and at the International Film Festival of Andaman and Nicobar.

Team Poonam would like to thank the festival organisers and members of the respective juries, for rewarding us. In the light and the delight, the producers have decided to begin screening the film to niche audiences and get their take on the film and its message. As a part of this initiative, the first screening of Poonam took place at the Jalsa – Magical Salon Concert Series‘ very first session, that makes the audience relive the past in the form of baithaks and addas to promote artists and Indian Art and Culture.

Padmashree nominee 2018, Dr. Manjula Raman, CEO, Royal Concorde Group of Schools – Bangalore who was attending the concert said “Jalsa is a unique experience bringing back reminiscence of yesterday baithaks that celebrating art and artist. The concept of having a small group of rasiks is unique and helps in curating a memorable experience. The ambience, the interaction amongst the invitees, the delicious spread and watching the film in togetherness, in an informal set-up was truly a beautiful experience.”

Dr. Manjula Raman shared the story of a friend similar to the film’s story. She cited the woes of ageing and expectations of parents as well as their children. She also emphasized on the need for some crucial changes, the society needs to bring about, in terms of tackling this issue. The audience was the right mix of senior citizens, middle-aged and young people and were moved by the film and Dr. Raman’s words.

The screening received great accolades from well-known members of the society. One of the recent viewers Biplob Das, HR Advisor – International Institute of Business Studies said, “Indeed every word is true in the current context, very strong message and nicely put across in the short film format.”

Media Contact : Shilpi Das Chohan, shilpi@shilpisvoiceandvisuals.com, 9902077066, Founder, Shilpi’s Voice & Visuals

Photo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1393612/3.jpg 

Photo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1393613/Uruvatti.jpg

Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1393614/1_Logo.jpg

Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1393615/2_Logo.jpg


The content is by PR NewsWire. DKODING Media is not responsible for the content provided or any links related to this content. DKODING Media is not responsible for the correctness, topicality or the quality of the content.

The post Film ‘Poonam’ is screening to great applause after winning 2 more awards appeared first on DKODING.



from https://www.dkoding.in/press-release/film-poonam-is-screening-to-great-applause-after-winning-2-more-awards/
via Dkoding RSS Feed

RedHill Biopharma Announces Positive Top-Line Safety and Efficacy Data from Phase 2 COVID-19 Study of Opaganib

RedHill

Preliminary data from the non-powered U.S. Phase 2 study of 40 hospitalized patients shows that orally-administered opaganib was safe, with no material safety differences between opaganib and control arms

Consistent trends demonstrate greater improvement in reducing oxygen requirement by end of treatment at Day 14 in the opaganib-treated arm across key primary and secondary efficacy outcomes, correlating with clinical improvement as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale

The opaganib-treated arm demonstrated a greater improvement in reaching room air within 14 days (52.6% vs. 22.2%); greater improvement in reduction to 50% supplemental oxygen by Day 14 (89.5% vs. 66.7%); a higher proportion of patients discharged by Day 14 (73.7% vs. 55.6%) and a greater reduction in the median total oxygen requirement (AUC) over 14 days (68.0% vs. 46.7%)

Top-line data from the global Phase 2/3 COVID-19 study in 270 hospitalized patients expected Q1/2021 and an interim DSMB futility analysis is expected in the coming weeks

Opaganib targets a human cell component involved in viral replication, potentially minimizing the likelihood for resistance due to viral mutations

TEL AVIV, Israel and RALEIGH, N.C., Dec. 31, 2020 /PRNewswire/ — RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDHL) (“RedHill” or the “Company”), a specialty biopharmaceutical company, today announced that preliminary top-line data from its U.S. Phase 2 study with orally-administered opaganib (Yeliva®, ABC294640)[1] in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia demonstrated positive safety and efficacy signals.

The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled U.S. Phase 2 proof-of-concept study with opaganib (NCT04414618) enrolled 40 patients requiring oxygen support. The study was not powered for statistical significance and aimed to evaluate safety and identify preliminary signs of activity. Patients in the study were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opaganib or placebo on top of standard-of-care (SoC) and were followed up for up to 42 days post treatment initiation.

  • Top-line results from the study found opaganib to be safe, with no material safety differences between the opaganib and placebo treatment arms. Overall, fewer patients suffered from serious adverse events (SAEs) in the opaganib treatment arm than in the placebo arm. In this small sample size, there were few events of intubation or fatality and these were balanced between the two arms.
  • The opaganib-treated arm demonstrated a consistent trend of greater improvement in reducing oxygen requirement by end of treatment on Day 14 across key primary and secondary efficacy outcomes, correlating with clinical improvement as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale:

    – A greater improvement in the proportion of patients reaching room air and no longer requiring oxygen support by Day 14 vs. the control arm (52.6% vs. 22.2%).

    – A greater improvement in the proportion of patients with 50% reduction in supplemental oxygen by day 14 vs. the control arm (89.5% vs. 66.7%).

    – A higher proportion of patients discharged by Day 14 vs. the control arm (73.7% vs. 55.6%).

    – A greater reduction from baseline of the median total oxygen requirement (AUC) over 14 days vs. the control arm (68.0% vs. 46.7%).

Full analysis of the data, including viral and inflammatory biomarker analyses, baseline risk factors and SoC background therapy stratifications, is expected in the coming weeks. The Company will provide the data for peer review when available.

“We are pleased with these encouraging top-line results from our exploratory Phase 2 study which confirm opaganib’s safety and demonstrate promising signals of activity when treating patients with COVID-19 and who require oxygen support. These preliminary results support our ongoing global Phase 2/3 study in severe COVID-19 pneumonia, which is expected to read out in Q1/2021. We continue to work diligently to compile a robust data set to support potential filing of global emergency use applications,” said Mark L. Levitt, MD, Ph.D., Medical Director at RedHill.

Gilead Raday, RedHill’s Chief Operating Officer, added: “Opaganib has a unique dual mode of action that is both anti-inflammatory and antiviral – acting on both the cause and the effects of COVID-19. Opaganib targets sphingosine kinase-2, a human cell component involved in viral replication and not the virus itself. The mounting evidence of new SARS-CoV-2 mutations emerging globally underscores the importance of this unique mechanism, which potentially minimizes the risk of viral resistance to therapy. The trends of patient improvement shown by the preliminary top-line data support the ongoing Phase 2/3 study with opaganib, which will provide a more in-depth understanding of opaganib’s activity.”

The efficacy of opaganib in severe COVID-19 pneumonia is being further explored in an ongoing global Phase 2/3 study and is expected to report top-line data in the first quarter of 2021. This study (NCT04467840) is being conducted across approximately 30 clinical sites in several countries and is on track to enroll up to 270 patients. The study has undergone two unblinded reviews of safety data by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), with unanimous recommendations to continue the study. An interim DSMB futility analysis will be conducted in the coming weeks, evaluating data from the first 135 subjects that have reached the primary endpoint.

The top-line results from the U.S. Phase 2 study of opaganib in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia are preliminary and were provided to the Company by an independent third-party following an initial independent analysis and remain subject to additional review and analysis. Such review and analysis may result in findings inconsistent with the results disclosed in this release and may not be replicated in future studies.

About Opaganib (ABC294640, Yeliva®)

Opaganib, a new chemical entity, is a proprietary, first-in-class, orally-administered, sphingosine kinase-2 (SK2) selective inhibitor with demonstrated dual anti-inflammatory and antiviral activity that targets a host cell component of viral replication, potentially minimizing the likelihood of viral resistance. Opaganib has also shown anticancer activity and has the potential to target multiple oncology, viral, inflammatory, and gastrointestinal indications.

Opaganib received Orphan Drug designation from the U.S. FDA for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma and is being evaluated in a Phase 2a study in advanced cholangiocarcinoma and in a Phase 2 study in prostate cancer. Opaganib is also being evaluated as a treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia in a global Phase 2/3 study and has demonstrated positive safety and efficacy signals in preliminary top-line data from a U.S. Phase 2 study.

Preclinical data have demonstrated both anti-inflammatory and antiviral activities of opaganib, with the potential to ameliorate inflammatory lung disorders, such as pneumonia, and mitigate pulmonary fibrotic damage. Opaganib demonstrated potent antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, completely inhibiting viral replication in an in vitro model of human lung bronchial tissue. Additionally, preclinical in vivo studies[2] have demonstrated that opaganib decreased fatality rates from influenza virus infection and ameliorated Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced lung injury by reducing the levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids.

Opaganib was originally developed by U.S.-based Apogee Biotechnology Corp. and completed multiple successful preclinical studies in oncology, inflammation, GI, and radioprotection models, as well as a Phase 1 clinical study in cancer patients with advanced solid tumors and an additional Phase 1 study in multiple myeloma.

The development of opaganib has been supported by grants and contracts from U.S. federal and state government agencies awarded to Apogee Biotechnology Corp., including from the NCI, BARDA, the U.S. Department of Defense and the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development.

The ongoing studies with opaganib are registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov, a web-based service by the U.S. National Institute of Health, which provides public access to information on publicly and privately supported clinical studies.

About RedHill Biopharma

RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDHL) is a specialty biopharmaceutical company primarily focused on gastrointestinal and infectious diseases. RedHill promotes the gastrointestinal drugs, Movantik® for opioid-induced constipation in adults with non-cancer pain[3], Talicia® for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in adults[4], and Aemcolo® for the treatment of travelers’ diarrhea in adults[5]. RedHill’s key clinical late-stage investigational development programs include: (i) RHB-204, with an ongoing Phase 3 study for pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections; (ii) opaganib (Yeliva®), a firstinclass SK2 selective inhibitor targeting multiple indications with a Phase 2/3 program for COVID-19 and Phase 2 studies for prostate cancer and cholangiocarcinoma ongoing; (iii) RHB-104, with positive results from a first Phase 3 study for Crohn’s disease; (iv) RHB-102 (Bekinda®), with positive results from a Phase 3 study for acute gastroenteritis and gastritis and positive results from a Phase 2 study for IBS-D; (v) RHB-107, a Phase 2-stage first-in-class, serine protease inhibitor, targeting cancer and inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases and is also being evaluated for COVID-19 and (vi) RHB106, an encapsulated bowel preparation. More information about the Company is available at www.redhillbio.com.

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements may be preceded by the words “intends,” “may,” “will,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “estimates,” “aims,” “believes,” “hopes,” “potential” or similar words and includes statements regarding the timing of the reporting of a full analysis of the data from the U.S. Phase 2 trial evaluating opaganib, the timing of potential emergency use applications for opaganib and the timing of reporting of top-line data, safety analysis and of unblinded futility interim analysis for the global Phase 2/3 study with opaganib. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and cannot be predicted or quantified, and consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the risk that the Company’s Phase 2/3 study evaluating opaganib will not be successful; the risk of a delay in receiving top-line data from the Phase 2/2 study and in receiving data to support emergency use applications or in making such emergency use applications, if at all; the risk that the full analysis of data from the U.S. Phase 2 clinical study evaluating opaganib will be delayed or will differ from the preliminary data; the risk that the Company will not initiate the Phase 2/3 study for opaganib in certain geographies, will not expand this study to additional countries and that it will not be successful and that enrollment, reporting of top-line data, safety analysis and/or unblinded futility interim analysis will be delayed; the risk that other COVID-19 patients treated with opaganib will not show any clinical improvement; the development risks of early-stage discovery efforts for a disease that is still little understood, including difficulty in assessing the efficacy of opaganib for the treatment of COVID-19, if at all; intense competition from other companies developing potential treatments and vaccines for COVID-19; the effect of a potential occurrence of patients suffering serious adverse events using opaganib under compassionate use programs, as well as risks and uncertainties associated with (i) the initiation, timing, progress and results of the Company’s research, manufacturing, preclinical studies, clinical trials, and other therapeutic candidate development efforts, and the timing of the commercial launch of its commercial products and ones it may acquire or develop in the future; (ii) the Company’s ability to advance its therapeutic candidates into clinical trials or to successfully complete its preclinical studies or clinical trials (iii) the extent and number and type of additional studies that the Company may be required to conduct and the Company’s receipt of regulatory approvals for its therapeutic candidates, and the timing of other regulatory filings, approvals and feedback; (iv) the manufacturing, clinical development, commercialization, and market acceptance of the Company’s therapeutic candidates and Talicia®; (v) the Company’s ability to successfully commercialize and promote Movantik®, Talicia® and Aemcolo®; (vi) the Company’s ability to establish and maintain corporate collaborations; (vii) the Company’s ability to acquire products approved for marketing in the U.S. that achieve commercial success and build and sustain its own marketing and commercialization capabilities; (viii) the interpretation of the properties and characteristics of the Company’s therapeutic candidates and the results obtained with its therapeutic candidates in research, preclinical studies or clinical trials; (ix) the implementation of the Company’s business model, strategic plans for its business and therapeutic candidates; (x) the scope of protection the Company is able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering its therapeutic candidates and commercial products and its ability to operate its business without infringing the intellectual property rights of others; (xi) parties from whom the Company licenses its intellectual property defaulting in their obligations to the Company; (xii) estimates of the Company’s expenses, future revenues, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; (xiii) the effect of patients suffering adverse events using investigative drugs under the Company’s Expanded Access Program; and (xiv) competition from other companies and technologies within the Company’s industry. More detailed information about the Company and the risk factors that may affect the realization of forward-looking statements is set forth in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 4, 2020. All forward-looking statements included in this press release are made only as of the date of this press release. The Company assumes no obligation to update any written or oral forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by law.

Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1334141/RedHill_Biopharma_Logo.jpg

Company contact:

Adi Frish

Chief Corporate & Business Development Officer

RedHill Biopharma

+972-54-6543-112

adi@redhillbio.com

Media contact (U.S.):

Bryan Gibbs

Vice President

Finn Partners

+1-212-529-2236

bryan.gibbs@finnpartners.com

1. Opaganib is an investigational new drug, not available for commercial distribution.

2. Xia C. et al. Transient inhibition of sphingosine kinases confers protection to influenza A virus infected mice. Antiviral Res. 2018 Oct; 158:171-177. Ebenezer DL et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa stimulates nuclear sphingosine-1-phosphate generation and epigenetic regulation of lung inflammatory injury. Thorax. 2019 Jun;74(6):579-591.

3. Full prescribing information for Movantik® (naloxegol) is available at: www.Movantik.com.

4. Full prescribing information for Talicia® (omeprazole magnesium, amoxicillin and rifabutin) is available at: www.Talicia.com.

5. Full prescribing information for Aemcolo® (rifamycin) is available at: www.Aemcolo.com.


The content is by PR NewsWire. DKODING Media is not responsible for the content provided or any links related to this content. DKODING Media is not responsible for the correctness, topicality or the quality of the content.

The post RedHill Biopharma Announces Positive Top-Line Safety and Efficacy Data from Phase 2 COVID-19 Study of Opaganib appeared first on DKODING.



from https://www.dkoding.in/press-release/redhill-biopharma-announces-positive-top-line-safety-and-efficacy-data-from-phase-2-covid-19-study-of-opaganib/
via Dkoding RSS Feed

Survivor Season 41 Brings Disappointing News For Fans

Survivor

Twenty years after its debut, will the game-changing reality show ‘Survivor’ Season 41 get to see the light of the day? Will ‘Survivor’ survive the pandemic punch?

Millions of viewers have huddled around their television sets in groups or individual sessions since the debut of ‘Survivor’ in 2000, week after week. People enjoy groups of contestants taking part in various challenges, forming alliances, and ultimately betraying one another ahead of the weekly tribal council. The reality show survived various challenges and stayed strong for 20 long years until 2020 when the premiere of the long-running reality competition series was called off after ‘Survivor’ Season 41 was postponed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Highlights —

  • Production updates of ‘Survivor’ Season 41
  • Jeff Probst in contact with government officials in Fiji for filming ‘Survivor’ Season 41
  • No fixed premiere date announced for ‘Survivor’ Season 41

Everyone is wondering when Jeff Probst, and all of that overly dramatic music and camera angles along with two tribes of contestants, will return to their television screens. Fans have been worried about the show getting cancelled. Well, the good news is that ‘Survivor’ Season 41 will definitely happen. Let’s find out when it will happen.

Video Credits: WatchMojo.com

Twenty years after its debut, will the game-changing reality show ‘Survivor’ Season 41 get to see the light of the day? Will the ‘Survivor’ survive the pandemic punch?

Production updates of ‘Survivor’ Season 41

Everyone was still working in an office till March. We were just weeks away from seeing ‘No Time To Die’, ‘Black Widow’s’ first standalone movie. Now it seems like time has been stung by the pandemic. ‘Survivor’ Season 41 was supposed to get underway in Fiji, back in March, that didn’t happen. Just a few weeks before the contestants were supposed to leave the country, CBS and the producers of the show pulled the plug on filming. Deadline reported the news:

“Due to concerns and uncertainty surrounding the spread of COVID-19 globally, CBS and the producers of ‘Survivor’ have taken the precautionary measure to delay production on the 41st season, which was set to begin filming later this month in Fiji.”

May 2020 filming plan of ‘Survivor’ Season 41 too was shelved

When lockdown started in March, no one really knew when it will end. The producers of ‘Survivor’ thought they had a chance to start production on season 41 (as well as season 42) as early as May. Jeff Probst, the host and the producer of the series, was so hopeful that he explained to the crew in a letter (via EW) sent out in Mach 2020, in which he stated:

“Our intention is to begin production after the [Season 40] live show. Therefore, subject to new information, our new planned start date for production would be on or about May 19th, 2020. Our intention is to still shoot both Seasons 41 and 42.”

Jeff Probst explained in the letter that ‘Survivor’ is composed of the most experienced television team and that they would be able to get through this situation as they have done in the past. The current status is that ‘Survivor’ Season 41 has yet to enter production because Fiji still hasn’t opened the gates for non-residents since the outbreak first began.

Jeff Probst in contact with government officials in Fiji for filming ‘Survivor’ Season 41

Fiji remains the filming location of ‘Survivor’ since Season 33 in 2016. But, to keep the spread of the COVID 19 virus down, the island nation has placed strict restrictions on its travel policies. This includes the production of the competition series like ‘Survivor’. Jeff Probst, while speaking with “The Hollywood Reporter” in July 2020, addressed this situation:

“They’ve done an incredible job of controlling the virus. They’ve had a total of only 15 cases [at the time] in their country, and they’ve had no active cases for months. They have figured out how to handle it, and they just want to ensure that when we come shoot there, we don’t change that. We’re working together with them, but they’ve been very production-friendly in terms of wanting it to happen.”

Jeff also mentioned that he’s in constant contact with government officials in Fiji. He is sure that they will come up with the best actions to put into place once production can finally get started.

‘Survivor’ Season 41 production to begin in April 2021

When a ‘Survivor’ insider reported that production on season 41 (and season 42) would not get underway in Fiji until April 2021, due to the restrictions put in place there, fans thought it was a joke. The production will run through July 2021. This makes it very hard to hit the air in September 2021. It’s not too far-fetched to assume that ‘Survivor’ won’t return until early 2022.

The ‘Survivor’ Season 41 cast

William Elton, one of the show’s casting editors, later announced on Instagram, just days before CBS postponed ‘Survivor’ Season 41, that the contestants for the next two seasons had been finalized. It remains to be seen how many of the cast members, due to the delay of nearly one year, will chart off to Fiji when production finally starts on season 41 in April 2021.

No fixed premiere date announced for ‘Survivor’ Season 41

There is no official premiere date set for ‘Survivor’ Season 41 at this point. Most likely, it won’t become available to us until production gets underway in 2021. A lot can happen between now and then, so make sure to check back on our website for all the latest information on ‘Survivor’.

Video Credits: Survivor Legend 68

The post Survivor Season 41 Brings Disappointing News For Fans appeared first on DKODING.



from https://www.dkoding.in/latest-news/survivor-season-41-brings-disappointing-news-for-fans/
via Dkoding RSS Feed

A Year In The Life Season 2 Will Transform The Way Fans See Gilmore Girls

A

‘A Year in the Life’ has ruined ‘Gilmore Girls’ for everybody. Will season 2 be able to change viewers’ opinion?

It was beauty in the little moments, the small details, which made ‘Gilmore Girls’ an obsession. With the end of the series, fans were left wanting more. It was only in 2016, 10 years after ‘Gilmore Girls’ went off the air, that the fans’ thirst was quenched with a reboot series named ‘A Year in the Life’. But much to their despair, this mini-series made the fans feel cheated and they wished that they had never watched the reboot.

Highlights —

  • How has ‘A Year in the Life’ ruined ‘Gilmore Girls’?
  • Fans wished they hadn’t watched ‘A Year in the Life’
  • Will ‘A Year in the Life’ Season 2 be able to make amends?

After living for a decade without Rory and her mom Lorelai, fans had higher expectations from the reboot series. Though it continued the same story that went off the air in 2007, fans weren’t satisfied. Why didn’t fans take the story well? Let’s find out.

Video Credits: MsMojo

‘Gilmore Girls’ fans wish for a world in which the reboot ‘A Year in the Life’ doesn’t exist.

How has ‘A Year in the Life’ ruined ‘Gilmore Girls’?

Unlike other TV shows in the 2000s, ‘Gilmore Girls’ was not centered around romance. Instead, it was about Rory, a girl who was smart, funny, compassionate, who loved to read and write, and the one who studied hard and wanted to be a journalist. Teenage girls aspired to be like her, and some even applied to journalism courses. Girls saw themselves in her – struggles, triumphs, and life, in general. So, when Netflix announced the revival of ‘Gilmore Girls’, fans were excited, only to later be disappointed in ‘A Year in the Life’.

Gilmore Girls season 2
Gilmore Girls: A Year In The Life season 2 update

The reboot series lacked the basic characterization of Rory Gilmore and changed the audiences’ perception of her. This series turned the wunderkind, Rory, into a bore.

Next, talking about the ruin-game, half-way through, the series was a lot to take. It offered a weird detour. And though ‘A Year in the Life’ summer cast included all the main characters, the series was graded low. We can only hope for a better new season if it ever happens!

Fans wished they hadn’t watched ‘A Year in the Life’

Six terrible hours of screen-time! The reboot series threw out everything good about the show that the fans relished. The original ‘Gilmore Girls’ was a series about girls who wanted to be grown-up not just to be successful, but important. With ‘Gilmore Girls: A Year in The Life’, fans expected to watch the forward journey of Rory, to know what’s coming ahead, her relationship with her mother, how she chased her goals, achieved her dreams, and believed in herself.

Instead, what they got was a story about Rory who’s still spiraling because she has a terrible self-aggrandizing attitude.

Video Credits: TIME

In a nutshell, this reboot series is nothing but joyless. All of the important characters are wallowing in misery. No wonder the hardcore fans wish they hadn’t watched the series. Because, you know, it is hurtful to watch someone you admire and someone you can relate to, taking a self-sabotaging path!

How ‘A Year in the Life’ Season 2 might undo all the damage done by season 1 of the ‘Gilmore Girls’ reboot.

Will ‘A Year in the Life’ Season 2 be able to make the amends?

The important question is, “Is season 2 happening?” With Alexis Bledel and Lauren Graham busy with other movies and TV shows, the renewal of ‘Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life’ for season 2 seems a tad bit difficult.

Though a fan has tweeted this:

But we aren’t very confident about its reliability. There isn’t a ‘A Year in The Life’ Season 2 trailer on the internet yet. All we can hope is that the next season of AYITL happens soon, and may it change the ruined image of the Gilmore girls!

Amy Sherman-Palladino, the show creator, explained during a Woodstock Film Festival that a lack of story line is NOT what is standing in the way of a sequel. So, we are guessing the only thing that’s standing between the fans and a second season revival is the busy schedules of the main leads. Have you watched the reboot series? What are your thoughts? Do you want a season 2? Let us know in the comments.

The post A Year In The Life Season 2 Will Transform The Way Fans See Gilmore Girls appeared first on DKODING.



from https://www.dkoding.in/trending-today/a-year-in-the-life-season-2-will-transform-the-way-fans-see-gilmore-girls/
via Dkoding RSS Feed